Newsgroups: comp.lang.logo Path: news.media.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!usenet.ufl.edu!draco.nova.edu!alpha!gowj From: gowj@alpha.acast.nova.edu (Big Jim) Subject: Re: Evolution of logo Message-ID: Sender: news@draco.nova.edu (Usenet Administrator) Organization: Nova University References: <1993Dec24.194331.91@magill.unisa.edu.au> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1993 13:15:34 GMT Lines: 23 tim@harlequin.com (Tim McNerney) writes: >This leaves me with some (perhaps naive) questions: >. Have there been similar studies exploring the benefits of a "Visual" Logo? Ya! What studies has Andy done with Boxer? Well in the Proceedings of Eruologo '93 Andys article on collaborating using Boxer andy says "...after four good years of further experince with Boxer, we have found code sharing consistently much more prominent than in any of ur many years working wiht Logo." One of the attributes Andy lists of Boxer in the same article is: "In terms of sharing, seeing what anothers code does and how it does it is much easier." >. Has anyone experimented with classroom aids ("props") to demonstrate list > operations? >--Tim -- Linc, James Internet: Gowj@novavax.nova.edu; UUCP: gatech!uflorida!novavax!gowj Songs of Solomon 2:12 "...the voice of the turtle is heard in our land." James Gow P.O. Box 700585 Miami, Fla. 33170. Disclaimer [Is this really necessary? I have a hard time getting people to understand that!]