Recent Changes - Search:

TEAMS Academy Wiki

THS

Explore TEAMS!
for visiting sophomores & juniors


Robotics


EnvBioTech

Bat Design

Assistive Tech

Students

Instructors

TEAMS Forum

TEAMS Calendar

TEAMS Web Site

Wiki Info

edit Robots.SideBar

Lab 2 Cliff Sensor Experiments

1. How does transparency affect the sensor signal?--->Daniela Garcia

2. Can cliff sensors recognize different colors? and if they can what does that mean?--->Taylor Gendron

3. Can cliff sensors recognize different surfaces?--->Mark Troutt

4. What effect does color have on the readings of cliff sensors?---> Chris Arndt

5. Does a shiny surface have any effect on the intensity?--->Casey Judge


Question 1.

Name: Daniela Garcia (red cohort)

Cliff Sensors work by sending and reflecting an infra-red laser. When reflected back, the information is processed and the state of the create is determined. The main function of the cliff sensors is to detect ground below the robot. The create can also read the strength of the signal which canges due to transparency, color, texture, and distance.

Purpose/Description of Experiment: Modifying the cliff sensors by covering them with different materials will change the sensors’ strength reading. The transparency will affect the strength of the signal. Each cliff sensor is modified/covered in a different way: nothing, paper, clear packing tape, and eletrical tape. The experiment was done on a white surface to minimize experimental error (white poster board).

Hypothesis: By modifying the transparency of the cliff sensors, the strength of the sensor will also be modified.

Averages from experiment:

  • Left Sensor (none)- 1316
  • Front Left Sensor (eletricial tape)- 1808
  • Front Righ Sensor- 1677
  • Right Sensor- 853

For complete lab results please click here: http://www.cs.uml.edu/teams-academy/uploads/Lab2/garcialab2datachart

Results/Conclusions: The less transparent a material is, the stronger the signal strength. This is due to the fact that the create needs a stronger signal to get a reading. Not only does the create need to get a signal, it needs to pass through the given material. The sensor with covered by the white computer paper was the weakest because it took the create the least amount of work to achieve a reading while the sensor with the electrical tape had the strongest reading because it was the least transparent material and the hardest material for the infrared to pass through. The reason I believe the paper had the weakest signal is due to the fact that the paper has many fibers which make it easy for the IR to pass through. The reason that the sensor with no covering was not weaker than the sensor with the paper is because it is reading the surface, the poster which is not letting in as much light.


Name: Taylor Gendron (Blue Cohort)

Purpose/Description of Experiment: The purpose of this lab was to experiment on the robot's cliff sensors by altering the environment of the robot in order to see how the cliff sensors work.The cliff sensors get a reading by shooting IR light at a surface and based on the strength of the signal that gets reflected back the create percieves whether of not a cliff is present(the create can also measure the specific strength of the signal).More specifically I measured the effect of different colors (construction paper) on the strength of the signal received by the robot. I also measured the strength of the cliff sensor signal when the same colors were covered with a shiny cover.


Results/Conclusions: If you look at the table and bar graph above you will see variance in the signal strength between different colors. The greatest variance occurred with the color black. The signal strength of the black construction paper was 1196, and the next lowest signal strength was brown at 1445(a difference of 249)! All the other colors were within a range of 221. The colors Yellow,Red,and Orange had extremely similar signal strengths( within a range of 29). The White paper had the second greatest signal strength only to blue, but the it was White printer paper rather than construction paper. I infer however that white construction paper would have a higher signal strength because it reflects more light than any other color. Next, I measured the signal strength when the papers were placed under a shiny cover. The signal strengths were about doubled but they maintained the same relationship between the colors. In light of the results of my experiments I can conclude that a create could definitely identify different colors and materials. For example if a length of colored tape or material was ran along the ground, the create could measure the signal strength and stay within a range of signal strengths which represent a certain color.


Name: Mark Troutt (Blue Cohort)

Purpose/Description of Experiment: The purpose of question 1 was to figure out how the cliff sensors work. I decided to see how the signal strength would change with different texture surfaces. I was almost done but then I read Taylor's lab about how much color could effect results so I've redone everything with the same color, white.

Results/Conclusions:

Cliff Sensor Signal Strength:

White SurfaceTrial 1Trial 2Trail3
Flat Paper236423642364
Carpet136413641364
Flimsy Plastic136414521324
Cloth130013041300
Styrofoam328432843284
Hard Plastic124012681292

As can be easily seen on the graph most of the different surfaces had similar signal strengths with the two huge exceptions being paper and styrofoam. It made sense to me that paper would have a higher signal than carpet and cloth, but I hadn't realized how reflective styrofoam was. I was also a bit surprised by the plastics because I thought they would have given a higher strength. I conclude from this information that the cliff sensors could be used to detect changes between certain surfaces, like onto or off of styrofoam or paper. This wouldn't really work for the others though because the strengths were too close together.


----

Name:Chris Arndt (Red Cohort?)
I think that the signal strength of the cliff sensors will vary with color such that the lighter colors will have a higher reading than darker ones. This is because the lighter the color, the closer it is to white, which is the color that reflects the most light. However, no matter what color, they will all be high enough to trigger the cliff sensor so that the robot knows there is something under it.
Purpose/Description of Experiment:
1. I will start the Create and enter the command "128 131 142 29" into the Realterm "Send" box. This command will give me a reading of the signal strength of the left cliff sensor.
2. I will then read the signal strength 3 times for each color and take the average of the three in order to ensure accuracy.
3. After taking these measurements, I will enter the command "128 131 142 9" into the Realterm "Send" box. This command will give me an on/off reading as to whether or not there is something under the robot or not (0 meaning there is ground under it, 1 meaning there is no ground).

Color of Paper Cliff or No Cliff Signal Strength (Crazy Numbers/Decimal)
Black Cliff 5 72/1352
Red Cliff 5 240/1520
Orange Cliff 7 0/1792
White Cliff 7 12/1804
Yellow Cliff 7 58/1850
Green Cliff 7 148/1940
Blue Cliff 7 164/1956


Results/Conclusions:
The robot read higher signal strenghths not for lighter colors, but for higher energy colors (violet being high-energy, red being low-energy). With the exception of white, the colors followed the pattern of the visible light spectrum (ROYGB). The higher-energy colors with shorter wave-lengths resulted in stronger signals. The lower-energy colors resulted in weaker signals.

Back to my page


Casey Judge Red Cohort Lab 2- Question 1

Testing the Intensity of the Cliff Sensors on shiny vs. non shiny colors.

Purpose, Hypothesis, and Procedure My purpose in this experiment is to test the change in intensity when in contact with colors with a shiny surface. I am testing the shiny surface by placing the paper in a page protector, and repeating the previous experiment. I predict that the shiny coating will make the intensity greater because of its reflective quality. The colors I will be testing are white, black, green, orange, yellow, red, and blue.

ColorIntensity Shiny 1Intensity Shiny 2Intensity Shiny 3Non shiny results - by Chris Arndt
Black1958215622001352
White2310234019361804
Red2063216925041520
Blue2004214026161956
Green1984185619801940
Orange2098199622041792
Yellow2246220820421850

Conclusion The conclusion of the experiment coincided with my hypothesis. However, I did notice a drastic change in the numbers between the first and second time I performed the experiment. Also, when collecting the data both times I sent the input numerous times to get an average of a few numbers. However, every time I did this, there were a few scattered extremely large numbers mixed in. I predict this is because of the reflective quality of the page protector. This plastic reflective material can be slightly curved or wrinkled which can cause the sensor’s light to bounce back at different intensities. This noise was a set back to my experiment.


Edit - History - Print - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on October 22, 2007, at 05:22 PM